Having read the review of Satio on GSMarena recently, i decided I have to do something about it. That site is quite popular and just like many prestigious newspaper ot TV-programs, it’s mind-changing i.e. often opinion of writer becomes opinion of a reader. In fact, I considered them as a reliable source of information for a very long time as well.
To start with, I’d like to comment on the list of disadvantages they’ve made:
1. (Xenon flash is not adequately powerful) – what??!! Did any of the competitors introduce anything better than that?? The Xenon Satio offers is far better than any LED. In fact, Satio has both LED and Xenon. Did SE do commit a crime by giving as a superb feature?! If there wasn’t Xenon, they would complain it’s not there… Xenon is exactly the same as in C905, so there shouldn’t be anything to be disappointed about, and definitely nothing to be called a disadvantage.
2. (The S60 5th edition UI isn’t to the best in class standards) – This one is just ridiculous. SE has developed the best Symbian UI so far. It’s breathtaking. The best interface I have ever used and it is a thing that has amazed me about Satio the most.
3. (No 3.5mm audio jack or a standard USB port) – It’s hard to argue with this one, I think it’s a matter of personal preference. Personally I prefer fast port much more. There are many reasons for it – one port instead of two, no need for rubber cover, compatible with all Sony Ericsson accessories (I use it with HPM-90 which I couldn’t use with X1 which had 3.5mm jack) and it doesn’t get itchy with time. Mini-USB port isn’t designed for frequent use and goes itchy when used daily for charging (like in X1). Ok, I know, there are some minuses as well… e.g. incompatibility with come universal devices or long cable when using your own earphones (I managed to overcome this problem though ๐ ). Once again, it’s a matter of preference really.
4. No DivX or XviD support out-of-the-box – this one is just stupid. Competition (based on same hardware) is using no more than Real player to play these files. Their generic players doesn’t support them either. My question is, how long does it take to install a player you want on Symbian? 1 min?? How can such a thing be called a disadvantage. For Samsung and LG, DIvX and XviD support is no more than fool marketing,
5. No smart or voice dialing – I cannot really argue with this one, as I don’t use it personally.
6. Playing flash videos in the browser easily depletes the available RAM – I haven’t really experienced this problem so far. But how can this be a disadvantage? ย I mean, how could this problem be solved? Satio has generous 256MB of RAM. It really is huge for a mobile phone. And your clip would have to be reeeealy long to fill that in. Again, did SE commit a crime be giving us a lovely YouTube app. ? If it wasn’t there, again, there wouldn’t be complain…
7. No office document editing (without a paid upgrade) – This one is just disgusting black marketing. SE did give use free partial license for MS Office reader. No editor, as this would significantly increase Satio price, and that is what SE would not want. Anyway, that was another favor from SE, why should we complain? Again, if it wasn’t there at all, there would be no complain…
8. No stereo speakers – this is the only one that’s reasonably fair. Stereo speakers would be nice, however I don’t think it’s essential, it’s actually a rare feature. Nevertheless, the speaker on Satio is one of the better ones I’ve heard and definitely outstanding for it’s size.
9. No digital compass (magnetometer) this one is most ridiculous out of all! Is that a standard (or even useful?!!) feature??!! How can such a thing be called a disadvantage??!!
GSMArena has shown a huge lack of professionalism. ย They either meant to be biased and do some black marketing, or because of lack of disadvantages they decided to create some to look unbiased. Either way, I think it’s ridiculous. If a source of information wants to be reliable (that’s the only way to become prestigious), it should play with it’s readers in that way.
The rest of their review is quite sensible and I think I would agree with MOST of it. There are 2 things I’d like to point out. One is sound quality. Again, complete lack of professionalism… How can they call disturbed frequency response a lack in quality??!! When it comes to actuall quality, Satio is the best in the league. ย Besically they have reduced the bass a little bit (low frequencies) and boosted the highs for clarity. This setting is perfectly matched with bundled HPM-77, which suffers from a bit too strong bass. For most people, Satio will be the best thing they have ever listened to. BTW, frequency response can be easily changed with firmware update, as it’s not hardware related. It’s no more than a form of equalisation. Also, I am sure we will see equaliser in Satio soon enough.
Last thing I’d like to comment on is picture quality, or rather it’s comparison with Pixon12. I won’t ever forgive them saying that Samsung won, even by a small margin. In what way is it better?! These so called ‘vibrant’ colours, are no vibrant, but oversaturated! And os unatural. Satio colours are very exact. And can easily be oversaturated with some PC software when require. But of course, when put next to Samsung they look washed out… It’s a shame to see how low GSMarena has fallen…